Tag Archives: Middle Ages

Bread and Cheese – get it wrong and you’re dead!

A Proper Ploughmans Lunch
Image via Wikipedia

An interesting bit of medieval trivia for a Friday.

During the Peasant’s Revolt of 1381 Flemings in the City of London were particularly targeted by Londoners involved in the revolt – they weren’t too keen on foreign merchants from Flanders coming over and disrupting their livelihood – some things in Britain never change unfortunately! And they used the excuse of the general uprising to settle some old scores.

To identify who was a Fleming the rebels asked people to pronounce the words “bread and cheese”, if there pronunciation was anything like “brote und kase” that was it, the poor unfortunate was for the chop. A number of Flemings were murdered during the general anarchy that persisted in London during the rising. Others to be targeted were lawyers and anyone associated with John of Gaunt – his palace of Savoy was famously sacked.

Enhanced by Zemanta

New content in Magic in the Middle Ages

I just added a new page in the Magic in the Middle Ages section:

Cases of Magic in Medieval England

This contains a couple of cases mentioned by Henry Charles Lea in his famous History of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages. It is interesting to note that magic was fairly rare as an offence in England, and, of course, the inquisition itself never formally operated in England.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Magic in the Middle Ages pages updated

I have updated the pages I have on Magic in the Middle Ages. Some of these have been re-ordered, but I have also added new content, including excerpts from some primary sources. In particular I would recommend checking out the Peter Lombard page, he had quite a bit to say about the nature of angels and demons.

I am adding content as I get a chance whilst researching background for my novel Hell has its Demons. Hope some of you find this information useful!

Medieval Myths about Peasant Hovels

This is the first in an occasional series of posts looking at commonly believed ‘myths’ about Medieval times. For instance many people, including some writers of popular history, often picture the medieval peasant as living in fairly primitive housing – perhaps basic wattle and daub or wooden structures.

However, evidence from archaeology shows that is not always the case. In fact where excavations have been made stone buildings are not uncommon. It might have been the case perhaps that these were owned by the wealthier peasants in the village – the free farmers who had managed to achieve a surplus after paying their rents. But sometimes it’s not just one or two houses in a village that are made of stone, but a whole cluster of them.
Colin Platt’s book Medieval England is a great book for demonstrating how archaeology can inform our historical understanding of the Middle Ages – and for debunking those medieval myths that we still have!

What did people believe in the Middle Ages, Part 2: Medical knowledge in the Middle Ages and Natural Science

Imagine you are suffering from a bad fever, aches, cough and general flu like symptoms. You might even have the fearsome swine flu. Nowadays you might take pain-killers to relieve the symptoms, or seek medical advice in case you had something more serious.

In the Middle Ages, if you could afford to see a doctor, it’s likely that a course of bleeding or phlebotomy would be prescribed.

Phlebotomy or Bloodletting

Phlebotomy was the practice popularized by the Ancient Greek medical authority Galen, which advocated the letting of blood from a patient (and anyone in order to maintain health). Symptoms such as fevers, headaches or apoplexy were thought to be induced by an imbalance of humours, which could be reduced by the letting of blood, as blood was thought to accumulate in the body. The idea of a circulation of blood having not been discovered at that time.

Medieval doctors based their practice on Galen and continued the practice of bloodletting. It was used to not only cure, but also to maintain health. For instance monks would routinely spend time in their infirmary to have bloodletting.

As can be seen from the above image, it was believed that bleeding in different parts of the body relieved different ailments. Much in the manner that treatments such as acupuncture and reflexology are supposed to work today. There are probably similarities in that it is likely that any positive effects would by psychosomatic rather than physical only.

Cauterization or branding

Related to bloodletting and perhaps more extreme was the remedy of cauterization or branding. Again the practice prescribed branding in different parts of the body to relieve different ailments.


The third strand of medieval medicine consisted of the use of various potions and poultices often based on herbal remedies. Some of these no doubt were effective if they used the right ingredients, for instance raspberry leaf to cure pain. But others such as fried mouse to cure whooping cough were sheer fancy but held to be just as effective.

Astrology and Natural Magic

Binding all these medical practices together was a deeply held belief in the influence of the stars and planets on events on earth. For instance there was a theory that different signs of the zodiac influenced different parts of the body. Again Galen, the principal medical authority, was to blame with his platonic belief that the stars influenced man and the diseases that affected him.

A step on from the herbal remedies of medieval medicine were what was in effect natural magic, i.e. the manipulation of elements in nature by man. This was now outside the sphere perhaps of the doctor and perhaps more in the area of the wise woman, who would in the early modern era be labelled a witch, who might administer a cure along with a conjuration bidding the disease to depart the patient’s body.

Conclusion of Part 2: Medical or Spiritual Cures?

So where did this leave the medieval man or woman requiring treatment for illness. If they were lucky an appropriate medicine might be prescribed, or perhaps the very act of seeking treatment would have a psychosomatic affect and help them get better. But it was very likely that if there ailment was serious medicine might be of very little help with them. And of course as it was often mixed with magic elements such as astrology the doctor could always blame the configuration of the stars for his patient’s continued suffering.

So a lack of scientific advancement held back medicine. Medieval people simply didn’t have the tools and knowledge to understand how health worked. They certainly liked to keep clean, but they might not understand the links between protecting water supplies from pollution and health. They thought in fact that the smell was the problem. So they would try to separate tanning for instance from residential areas, but they may not realise that they needed to protect the water supply too to prevent sewage entering drinking water. Although the staple drink was beer rather than water so they must have known that drinking water could be bad for you.

My thesis as stated in the first post of this series is that a lack of advancement in medicine lead to more deeply ingrained popular belief in religion in ancient and medieval times. The lack of effective medicine at this time meant that an earthly cure was unlikely to be thought superior to a spiritual one as the chances of being cured were fairly low, and also linked already to preternatural elements – i.e. the movements of the stars.

Part 3 will examine the nature of popular belief in the middle ages, especially the major functions of religion for most people at the time.

What did people believe in the Middle Ages, Part 1

The Middle Ages are known as a time of greater religious belief and spirituality than our modern times, at least in terms of Western Christianity. The massive influence of the Church on politics and society and thought indicates that religion was at this time stronger than it is today.

For a writer of historical fiction set in the Middle Ages this assumption has huge implications. It would indicate that most of ones characters, whether educated or not, would have a deep belief in the teachings of the Church – unless of course they were a heretic with divergent beliefs to the orthodox.

Most of the evidence that I have read indicates that atheism or agnosticism was not really a factor. People believed in God full stop, but how they believed might vary.

But what did they believe and why?

I think most of living today who are atheists or agnostic assume that the nearly total belief in God was due to a number of possible reasons:

1. People were less educated and didn’t have the intellectual tools to think through their belief
2. People were oppressed by a Church authority that controlled accepted beliefs
3. Lack of scientific advancement meant that man had little way of understanding nature except as a creation of a God or gods

However, I think we are perhaps misguided if we think in these terms.

From the research I have done recently the evidence seems to indicate more fundamental reasons for acceptance of religious belief, and also perhaps its fading away in the modern age. The reasons, I think, point to the paucity of medical knowledge and the needs people had for gods, Gods, saints or demons to intercede for them.

I plan to discuss this in more detail in 4 further posts. The posts will be:

2. Medical knowledge in the Middle Ages and Natural Science
3. The nature of popular belief in the Middle Ages
4. Tension between popular and intellectual belief
5. Effects of the Reformation on belief

Magic in the Middle Ages: Natural vs Demonic

Another page on my Stupor Mundi site published, this time looking at the subject of Magic! All the content here is taken from the book by Kieckhefer – its basically my notes of the examples he provides. 

Magic, according to those who dwelt on such things came in two main flavours in the Middle Ages. Natural or occult magic was based on special properties of natural occuring things, for instance magical properties of certain herbs or animals etc, whereas demonic magic was specifically the summoning of spirits for evil. 

How magic was viewed in the Middle Ages is a fascinating subject. It was believed to be real and quite dangerous. Richard Kieckhefer’s book Magic in the Middle Ages is a brilliant introduction to the subject area and I recommend reading it. As well as introducing the background to belief, it also traces the classical, celtic and germanic background to magic in Western Europe, as well as looking at Arabic and Jewish sources. The development of a clerical underground and the developing persecution of witches is also covered. 
For me however, the most useful aspect was just to get a reliable source of possible examples of how magic was practiced in the middle ages. I’m currently working on stories set in a historical context where the characters use, or attempt to use magic, so I found this book invaluable. Although it’s an academic text, it is not dry or dull at all.